Feeds

Via downplays swift Joshua impact

Slow and steady, not quick and dirty

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

CeBIT 2000 Via's chairman is making a keynote speech here at CeBIT later in the day and is sure to say some interesting things about the relationship it has with Intel and the rest of the industry. But, in the meantime, we stopped by the Via stand, which like AMD, Intel and National Semiconductor, is also in the farflung reaches of Halle 13, reached by trudging through many a snowflake from the north end of the show. Robert Brown, marketing director of Via, said that his company was happy to have released Joshua but dampened down any kind of talk that the Cyrix chip will make any massive inroads into the low end of the CPU market. He said that, realistically, it was likely to be a year before Via was able to deliver the back end infrastructure needed to deliver Joshua processors to the Flashpoints and Arrows of this world, and still needed to sort out how it would deliver the right type of support to this type of channel. However, Brown also said that there is a relatively large tranche of second tier vendors who would be enthusiastic about the chips and could deliver systems at a price performance point that would appeal to the lower end of the market. That, he said, was where the growth in the market would be and he expressed doubt about whether Intel's Timna processor, at the price, could deliver this level of price performance. He said that Via would carefully move to position Joshua at the right level in the market and could afford to take time to do so in the right way, pointing out that it had established a position in the chipset market over a period of some years. And why is Intel so paranoid about Via? It's not chipsets that are exercising Intel's mind, he thinks, but rather that when Via does begin to roll out large numbers of processors, it will effectively pull the rug from under Chipzilla's feet at the low end. He also reckoned, and we feel he's right, that CPUs are getting to the stage where they will no longer be considered as that important, and will, eventually, cost pennies. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.