Smutty emailers sacked at New York Times
Was Big Brother watching, or did someone snitch?
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
The New York Times embarked on a mass firing this week after staff were discovered sending "offensive" and smutty emails.
All 23 sacked employees worked at the newspaper's administrative departments, based in Virginia and had their actions uncovered when the company intercepted internal emails.
Russell Lewis, president and CEO at the New York Times, sent an email to all staff telling them of the firings.
"While the company does not routinely monitor the email communications of employees, we do investigate when a violation of the company's email policy is reported," the memo said.
The nature of the material sent was not disclosed, but "all transmitted clearly inappropriate and offensive material, which left no doubt as to the discipline required," the memo continued.
Many other employees at the New York Times received disciplinary warning letters over the matter.
The UK press today reported that the emails were sex-related and included dirty notes and sexy photographs.
This is not the first time the New York Times has fired staff for email violations, but the company said it was the biggest mass lay-off so far for such as offence.
According to the company's email policy, computers cannot be used to "create, forward or display any offensive or disruptive messages, including photographs, graphics and audio materials". (r)
Related Stories
Xerox fires 40 in porn site clampdown
You can't get smuttier than a Kwik-Fit Fitter
IT manager fired for lunchtime Web surfing
Five sacked by Rolls Royce for porno emails
Rolls-Royce emailers' jobs still in jeopardy
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
Cloud based data management
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
