Feeds

Partisanship kills US e-signatures bill

Lawmaking as election campaigning...again

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Maximizing your infrastructure through virtualization

The US House of Representatives failed to pass a bill which would have given legal weight to electronic signatures, primarily due to party posturing in anticipation of the 2000 elections. Democrats were particularly loath to support the bill in the face of criticism that it could undermine consumer protections by enabling strictly electronic contract disclosures from vendors. In practice, such concerns could be addressed by requiring both email and snail mail notice of contractual terms, alterations, and warranty recall advisories. But no one wishes to enter the election season with so much as the appearance that they might be less than vigilant in defending consumers against exploitation by mendacious Capitalist hustlers. And of course by distancing themselves now, Congressional Democrats can accuse their Republican opponents of collaborating with Big Business when they hit the campaign trail. The White House, too, stepped away, almost certainly for the same reason, but on the novel pretext that the bill would usurp states' rights to govern commerce within their own borders. "The bill being considered by the House would preempt state laws unnecessarily, both in degree and duration," the White House said via a prepared statement. This may be an historic moment, marking the first time the Clinton Administration has acted in favour of states' rights. But then again, perhaps not, as political ammunition, innuendo and "spin" have always been the Administration's most finely-crafted and successful products. Had the bill passed, it would have gone to Conference Committee for reconciliation with a Senate version, and might possibly have issued forth from 106th Congress as law before the Winter recess. It will now be for the 107th to take up in the more sober political environment afforded by two years' distance from the next election cycle. ®

Top three mobile application threats

More from The Register

next story
BBC goes offline in MASSIVE COCKUP: Stephen Fry partly muzzled
Auntie tight-lipped as major outage rolls on
iPad? More like iFAD: We reveal why Apple fell into IBM's arms
But never fear fanbois, you're still lapping up iPhones, Macs
Nadella: Apps must run on ALL WINDOWS – PCs, slabs and mobes
Phone egg, meet desktop chicken - your mother
White? Male? You work in tech? Let us guess ... Twitter? We KNEW it!
Grim diversity numbers dumped alongside Facebook earnings
Microsoft: We're making ONE TRUE WINDOWS to rule us all
Enterprise, Windows still power firm's shaky money-maker
HP, Microsoft prove it again: Big Business doesn't create jobs
SMEs get lip service - what they need is dinner at the Club
ITC: Seagate and LSI can infringe Realtek patents because Realtek isn't in the US
Land of the (get off scot) free, when it's a foreign owner
Dude, you're getting a Dell – with BITCOIN: IT giant slurps cryptocash
1. Buy PC with Bitcoin. 2. Mine more coins. 3. Goto step 1
There's NOTHING on TV in Europe – American video DOMINATES
Even France's mega subsidies don't stop US content onslaught
prev story

Whitepapers

Top three mobile application threats
Prevent sensitive data leakage over insecure channels or stolen mobile devices.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Top 8 considerations to enable and simplify mobility
In this whitepaper learn how to successfully add mobile capabilities simply and cost effectively.
Application security programs and practises
Follow a few strategies and your organization can gain the full benefits of open source and the cloud without compromising the security of your applications.
The Essential Guide to IT Transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIO's automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise.