Feeds

Net name row ends in silence

Legal battle averted -- for the time being at least

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

The threat of legal action against ISP Freenetname has failed to materialise despite the promise by Web company NetNames that it would "protect its trade mark most vigorously". Forty-eight hours after the Internet Technology Group ISP launched its service offering users a free domain, as well as Net access, lawyers for London-based domain name registrars NetNames contacted Freenetname asking the company to stop trading. NetNames alleged Freenetname was passing off and attempting to misappropriate the goodwill invested in NetNames. Freenetname denied any wrongdoing and said it had no intention to abandon the use of Freenetname. Steve Miller, the former marketing director of NetNames who this week joined Virtual Internet, told New Media Investor: "NetNames is going to protect its trade mark most vigorously, and of course our lawyers are in touch with Freenetname." That was almost a month ago and since then Freenetname has heard nothing. Rhian Ball, development director at Freenetname believes Netnames' silence suggests they have stepped back from the brink of legal action. "Having now had no response from NetNames or their lawyers for three weeks, we are advised that this delay has prejudiced a judge granting an immediate injunction against Freenetname to stop trading," she said. "However, NetNames could still take us to trial if they thought they had a case...[but that] would probably take many months to be heard," she said. She was adamant that Freenetname's defence was watertight and that NetNames -- like fictional pirate Long John Silver -- didn't have a leg to stand on. Late this afternoon Ivan Pope, md of NetNames reaffirmed the allegation that Freenetname was trying to dilute the value of the NetNames brand. "We're still pursuing this," he said adding that the case was still in the hands of his lawyers. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
DOUBLE BONK: Testy fanbois catch Apple Pay picking pockets
Users wail as tapcash transactions are duplicated
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Google Glassholes are UNDATEABLE – HP exec
You need an emotional connection, says touchy-feely MD... We can do that
YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
Spaffing copyrighted stuff over the web? No search ranking for you
prev story

Whitepapers

Why cloud backup?
Combining the latest advancements in disk-based backup with secure, integrated, cloud technologies offer organizations fast and assured recovery of their critical enterprise data.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
New hybrid storage solutions
Tackling data challenges through emerging hybrid storage solutions that enable optimum database performance whilst managing costs and increasingly large data stores.