Feeds

Health sector ISP attacked by hospital staff

Private service at odds with NHS' existing network

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup

A subscription-free ISP offering to plough its profits back into the cash-strapped National Health Service (NHS) has come under fire from the very people it claims it will help. NHSpeople.net is aimed at people who work in the health service but is facing allegations that it is in competition with the NHS' own secure internal network, NHSnet. NHSnet -- which is owned and run by BT and Cable & Wireless -- is not without its knockers though. A recent report by the BBC's Newsnight claimed many clinicians and health trusts had lost confidence in the service saying it was neither secure nor reliable. Barry James, a director of NHSpeople.net, said: "There are thousands of doctors, clinicians and NHS managers who are frustrated at the limitations of the current Internet provision within the NHS, who are crying out for reliable, secure electronic communications." This particular storm in a bedpan has also dumped itself on the doorstep of the government. "There's a fair bit of fretting and fuming going on at the Department of Health (DoH)," said James. "They see this [NHSpeople.net] as potentially stepping on their toes," he said. He may be right. The Register has learned that some of the staff working on the NHSnet project have expressed their concerns about the new service. And while the official line from the DoH is that it views NHSpeople.net as any other commercial provider, a spokesman made it clear that the service was not endorsed by the NHS. It's also investigating whether NHSpeople.net is in breach of any trading laws since it is using the name and logo of the NHS. "It looks like it is accredited by the NHS but it is not," said a spokesman at the DoH, worried that it might mislead some people. NHSnet is part of a seven-year £1 billion project to modernise the NHS by using wired services to speed up referrals, obtain patient information and allow hospitals to communicate with one another more quickly. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
Assange™: Hey world, I'M STILL HERE, ignore that Snowden guy
Press conference: ME ME ME ME ME ME ME (cont'd pg 94)
Premier League wants to PURGE ALL FOOTIE GIFs from social media
Not paying Murdoch? You're gonna get a right LEGALLING - thanks to automated software
Caught red-handed: UK cops, PCSOs, specials behaving badly… on social media
No Mr Fuzz, don't ask a crime victim to be your pal on Facebook
Ballmer quits Microsoft board to spend more time with his b-balls
From Clippy to Clippers: Hi, I see you're running an NBA team now ...
Online tat bazaar eBay coughs to YET ANOTHER outage
Web-based flea market struck dumb by size and scale of fail
Amazon takes swipe at PayPal, Square with card reader for mobes
Etailer plans to undercut rivals with low transaction fee offer
Call of Duty daddy considers launching own movie studio
Activision Blizzard might like quality control of a CoD film
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.