Feeds

Chip firms FUD end users over .18µm v .25µm technology

Just how the hell are you gonna tell?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

A reader of The Register has highlighted the level of fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD) chip companies are generating by using the micron (µm) word in their spin doctoring. A few days ago, the reader said he was about to buy a notebook PC and had heard that Intel had introduced a .18µm processor for the mobile market. But when he approached his favoured vendor, the PC firm was unable to tell him which machines used mobile .25µm and which .18.µm microprocessors. He said: "Here's my problem. I want to get a laptop with the .18µm mobile PII processor, but I have no clue how to tell which manufacturers are using the .18 version and which are using the .25 version. We have some .25µ 366MHz PII's and they run *dang* hot, so I know I don't want the 400MHz version of the same. The .18µm version should be real nice, if I can be sure I'm getting one. "So, do any of you know who's using what? My account rep at Dell told me they are using the .25µm chip and won't switch to the .18µm chip until the Cumine PIII comes out, which is (now) going to be in November. I don't want to have to wait that long." An Intel representative commented: "Thereis no way for an end user to differentiate, dual availability is more targeted at transition management of corporate users/manufacturers - performance is comparable, but .18µm is obviously the start point for the faster mobile processors to come." In other words, you can't tell. Now that the megahertz thing seems to be fixed in people's minds, the chip manufacturers -- and both AMD and Intel are guilty here -- seem to want the world to think about microns and sub-microns and the difference thereof. In reality, as every PC user knows, the performance of a machine is based on a combination of factors including hard drive speed, memory type and speed, graphics card as well as the microprocessor. For some reason, everyone has got fixated on the chips. Some of us here at The Reg are even obsessive-compulsive about the subject... ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.