Feeds

Intel changes Inside plan to squeeze OEMs using competing chips

Rebates will disappear if non Intel chips used in "family" machines

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

The essential guide to IT transformation

An OEM told The Register today that Intel changed its Intel Inside plan this week to put pressure on companies wanting to sell AMD, Cyrix and other competing microprocessors. But Intel was swift to rebut the suggestion, saying that the OEM had possibly misunderstood the programme and should contact his local representative. The OEM, who said he did not want to be named, said: "Until now, Intel refunded 60 per cent of an advert for PCs, as long as the many requirements about the Intel Inside logos were respected AND there was no other CPU brand in the same ad. We can understand that, who would sponsor adverts for the competition." But the rules have now changed, the OEM alleged. "Starting now, Intel is asking for OEMs to declare that in the product range or family of PCs there is no other CPU brand manufactured or offered. If there is any other brand present in the range of products, Intel will contribute zero." He said manufacturers only have two solutions, either to pull off all non-Intel CPUs in an existing range to continue to get marketing funds, or if an OEM wants to offer computers with alternative CPUs, it will have to create a new range of products with a different name or look. "We strongly suspect this is one of the main reasons many large OEMs are loyal to Intel. But it is certainly very unfair to the competition," he said. An Intel representative said that while the terms of its Intel Inside branding exercise were confidential, his understanding of the company's agreement is different. "When you enter the programme, you identify your product lines to Intel," he said. "Above and beyond that, there is no limit to the platforms you bring to market." He claimed that Intel would not impose a zero rebate on cooperative marketing funds given a situation such as the above. "He should go back to his Intel Inside representative," he said. ® See also System builders fear Intel's wrath as K7 launches

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Barnes & Noble: Swallow a Samsung Nook tablet, please ... pretty please
Novelslab finally on sale with ($199 - $20) price tag
Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws
Yep, that one place you'd hoped you wouldn't find 'em
Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
Yanked footage featured British-accented attacker and US journo James Foley
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
Netflix swallows yet another bitter pill, inks peering deal with TWC
Net neutrality crusader once again pays up for priority access
Judge nixes HP deal for director amnesty after $8.8bn Autonomy snafu
Lawyers will have to earn their keep the hard way, says court
Ex-IBM CEO John Akers dies at 79
An era disrupted by the advent of the PC
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.