Feeds

Feds investigate MS over accounting ‘irregularities’

Whistleblower court case comes back to haunt company

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

The Essential Guide to IT Transformation

Microsoft admitted yesterday that it is being investigated by the US Securities and Exchange Commission over a possible breach of SEC rules. In a conference call, CFO Greg Maffei said that the SEC is investigating the way that Microsoft treats reserves. In a crafty move to detract from the significance of the SEC move, Microsoft also announced some unrelated changes in accounting practices. Maffei also said that he was "comfortable" with the estimates being made for Q4, which has just concluded: the results will be announced on 19 July. Microsoft was told of the SEC investigation some months ago. It began in January following disclosures related to a wrongful dismissal claim brought by Microsoft's former general auditor, Charles Pancerzewski. (Earlier story) He was offered a "resign or be fired" choice in 1996 after he drew attention to accounting practice irregularities. Mike Brown, the former CFO, wrote in an email to Gates that "I believe we should do all we can to smooth our earnings and keep a steady state model". Pancerzewski was appointed in February 1995 and complained that Microsoft used its reserves to pad its earnings in lean quarters. This would mean that Microsoft misreported its earnings, in breach of SEC rules, but its share price kept rising. For its part, Wall Street does not seem to mind. It is argued, in the WSJ in particular where undoubtedly there are vested interests in keeping Microsoft's share price up, that even if the accounts had to be restated, the result would be to show more income from the secret slush fund, so there was no deception. Pancerzewski had a negative review of his work from Brown in August 1995, after which he received the quit or be fired ultimatum. The result was that he quit, but filed suit under the Whistleblowers Protection Act in 1997. Microsoft's records were subpoenaed. Judge Carolyn Dimmick dismissed some charges, including age discrimination, but said there was enough evidence to go to trial on the whistleblower charges. In November, the case was quietly settled out of court, with Pancerzewski apparently accepting $4 million in compensation. One of the terms of the settlement was a gagging agreement, of course, and the court record being sealed. Both Brown and Pancerzewski were formerly with Deloitte & Touche, Microsoft's auditors. The circumstances in which Brown left Deloitte to become CFO while the firm was the auditor have not been satisfactorily explained, and could well be against even the elastic ethical rules about jumping ship from auditor to client. Brown however head-hunted Pancerzewski to Microsoft, prior to having his head. The SEC won't comment on the case, and Microsoft is naturally protesting its innocence in the matter. But from what has been seen in the Microsoft trial, such protests must now be tempered by disclosures of unethical business practices. The big difference between the present DoJ antitrust case and being found guilty of false accounting charges is that people can go to prison for the latter. There seems to be little doubt that any manipulation of earnings results would have been to prop up the share price. There are also other matters that will concern the SEC, including the exact way in which analyst expectations are always exceeded so far as Microsoft's results are concerned. There is enough flexibility in the rules of accounting practice to make it just possible for this to be done legally, but it would be very easy to step over this boundary, and a legal challenge by the SEC cannot be ruled out. Microsoft has also been very lax in making formal statements to the SEC about changes in share ownership by Microsoft executives. An SEC rule requires that it be notified no later than the tenth day of the month following the transaction. There was a noticeable improvement in this reporting when the trial started. In addition, statements during the trial by Microsoft's economics witness Richard Schmalensee showed that Microsoft told him it did not account for Windows revenue, and that IE development costs could not be separated. There was widespread incredulity about this. With Microsoft's shares rising $2.19 to $90.19 yesterday, it would be interesting to know if Microsoft was a major buyer of its own shares yesterday, so as to ensure that the share price did not dip on the news, and start a panic. ®

The Essential Guide to IT Transformation

More from The Register

next story
BBC goes offline in MASSIVE COCKUP: Stephen Fry partly muzzled
Auntie tight-lipped as major outage rolls on
iPad? More like iFAD: We reveal why Apple fell into IBM's arms
But never fear fanbois, you're still lapping up iPhones, Macs
Sonos AXES support for Apple's iOS4 and 5
Want to use your iThing? You can't - it's too old
Stick a 4K in them: Super high-res TVs are DONE
4,000 pixels is niche now... Don't say we didn't warn you
Philip K Dick 'Nazi alternate reality' story to be made into TV series
Amazon Studios, Ridley Scott firm to produce The Man in the High Castle
There's NOTHING on TV in Europe – American video DOMINATES
Even France's mega subsidies don't stop US content onslaught
You! Pirate! Stop pirating, or we shall admonish you politely. Repeatedly, if necessary
And we shall go about telling people you smell. No, not really
Too many IT conferences to cover? MICROSOFT to the RESCUE!
Yet more word of cuts emerges from Redmond
Joe Average isn't worth $10 a year to Mark Zuckerberg
The Social Network deflates the PC resurgence with mobile-only usage prediction
prev story

Whitepapers

Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
The Essential Guide to IT Transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIO's automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
How modern custom applications can spur business growth
Learn how to create, deploy and manage custom applications without consuming or expanding the need for scarce, expensive IT resources.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.