Feeds

Intergraph CEO claims Intel “grossly misrepresented” facts

Alabama judge sets date for trial in Year 2000

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes

A year ago Posted 22 June 1998 -- a year ago A war of words between Intergraph and Intel has escalated after the chip giant filed a counter suit in Alabama last week. Jim Meadlock, CEO of Intergraph, which is cited by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) along with Compaq and Digital in antitrust allegations against Intel, was also responding to a request for a summary injunction it made in the same court. He hit out at Intel for attempting to delay the legal process. Meadlock's company is separately suing Intel for anti-competitive behaviour, patent infringement and alleged antitrust violations. He said: "Intel's motion for a summary judgement mistakenly implied that there is no need for a trial on Intergraph's parents. It reflects Intel's orchestrated efforts to obscure the facts, distract attention away from the core issues surrounding Intergraph's case, and delay the legal proceedings." He revealed that Judge Edwin Nelson, who presides over a district course in Alabama, denied Intel's request to stay the prosecution of his company's patent infringement claims, and also set a date for the hearing. But that hearing will not begin until the middle of February, in the year 2000. Judge Nelson said that he has set aside five weeks for the trial. The judge added that the preliminary injunction he granted Intergraph on 10 April last still stands. Meadlock hit out at Intel's claims that when it bought Fairchild technology from National Semiconductor it also inherited cross licence agreements. He said: "Intel is grossly misrepresenting the facts surrounding its licensing agreement with National Semiconductor by selectively quoting portions of the agreement. Moreover, Intel has asked the court to seal their licensing agreement with National Semiconductor from public view, thus keeping the complete facts from the public." He claimed that Intergraph bought the Clipper chip directly from Fairchild in 1987, which was before NatSemi bought Fairchild. That meant, he said, that Intel had no cross licence agreement with Fairchild, when it bought the Clipper patents. He added: "Most importantly, Intergraph's case isn't just about patent infringement. It's about Intel's wilful and unconscionable anti-competitive behaviour that threatened to put Intergraph out of business in its efforts to access Intergraph's patents royalty free. Intergraph has a strong case and we're confident that we'll prevail." He claimed that Intel did not raise its cross licensing defence until after Intergraph had filed suit against it. "Its a late and baseless claim," said Meadlock. ®

A new approach to endpoint data protection

More from The Register

next story
Amazon says Hachette should lower ebook prices, pay authors more
Oh yeah ... and a 30% cut for Amazon to seal the deal
Philip K Dick 'Nazi alternate reality' story to be made into TV series
Amazon Studios, Ridley Scott firm to produce The Man in the High Castle
Nintend-OH NO! Sorry, Mario – your profits are in another castle
Red-hatted mascot, red-colored logo, red-stained finance books
Sonos AXES support for Apple's iOS4 and 5
Want to use your iThing? You can't - it's too old
Joe Average isn't worth $10 a year to Mark Zuckerberg
The Social Network deflates the PC resurgence with mobile-only usage prediction
Chips are down at Broadcom: Thousands of workers laid off
Cellphone baseband device biz shuttered
Feel free to BONK on the TUBE, says Transport for London
Plus: Almost NOBODY uses pay-by-bonk on buses - Visa
Twitch rich as Google flicks $1bn hitch switch, claims snitch
Gameplay streaming biz and search king refuse to deny fresh gobble rumors
Stick a 4K in them: Super high-res TVs are DONE
4,000 pixels is niche now... Don't say we didn't warn you
prev story

Whitepapers

7 Elements of Radically Simple OS Migration
Avoid the typical headaches of OS migration during your next project by learning about 7 elements of radically simple OS migration.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
Solving today's distributed Big Data backup challenges
Enable IT efficiency and allow a firm to access and reuse corporate information for competitive advantage, ultimately changing business outcomes.
A new approach to endpoint data protection
What is the best way to ensure comprehensive visibility, management, and control of information on both company-owned and employee-owned devices?