Feeds

Linux disties clash over PowerPC clustering quality

Is PowerPC better for parallel computing than Intel, Alpha or not?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

The Mac Linux community was in a some confusion today when it emerged that attempts to show the Linux on the PowerPC was an ideal platform for parallel computing systems might not be all they were cracked up to be. TerraSoft Solutions (TSS) a couple of days ago announced Black Lab Linux, a version of the company's Champion Server Linux distribution for cluster computing. TSS claims Black Lab Linux offers a "robust, low cost and low power consumption, high performance advanced computing solution". Essentially, the Black Lab business designs and specifies clusters of PowerPC-based machines running Champion Server. Linux on PowerPC, a company consultant claimed, was "a viable and competitive solution" for parallel computing. But today, a spokesman for rival Linux distributor LinuxPPC, claimed TerraSoft had got it wrong. Cited by leading Mac information service, MacInTouch, he said a "group of researchers at the Distributed and High-Performance Computing (DHPC) Group at University of Adelaide in Australia published a paper finding that Linux on PPC is a poor choice for clustering". The DHPC group's findings, published in March, compared a cluster of iMacs, a Beowulf-style Pentium-based PC cluster and a network of DEC Alpha workstations. In benchmarks, the iMac system didn't come out too well compared with the others. "The group used iMacs and an older version of LinuxPPC, but the results are clear: Intel and Alpha clusters massively outperformed the iMac cluster," said the LinuxPPC spokesman. So, who is correct? Well, the DHPC group did use an old version of LinuxPPC, whereas Black Lab Linux is based on a far more recent release of the Linux kernel. And, Black Lab doesn't claim to be better than Alpha or Pentium solutions, merely that it consumes less power. Still, that doesn't necessarily make it a "viable" or "competitive" solution, either. We were unable to download the University of Adelaide report at the time of posting to confirm their findings. However, a follow-up survey, using more recent versions of both LinuxPPC and Champion Server, would certainly go some way to clear up the issue. ®

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

More from The Register

next story
MI6 oversight report on Lee Rigby murder: US web giants offer 'safe haven for TERRORISM'
PM urged to 'prioritise issue' after Facebook hindsight find
I'll be back (and forward): Hollywood's time travel tribulations
Quick, call the Time Cops to sort out this paradox!
Assange™ slumps back on Ecuador's sofa after detention appeal binned
Swedish court rules there's 'great risk' WikiLeaker will dodge prosecution
NSA mass spying reform KILLED by US Senators
Democrats needed just TWO more votes to keep alive bill reining in some surveillance
prev story

Whitepapers

Seattle children’s accelerates Citrix login times by 500% with cross-tier insight
Seattle Children’s is a leading research hospital with a large and growing Citrix XenDesktop deployment. See how they used ExtraHop to accelerate launch times.
How to determine if cloud backup is right for your servers
Two key factors, technical feasibility and TCO economics, that backup and IT operations managers should consider when assessing cloud backup.
Getting started with customer-focused identity management
Learn why identity is a fundamental requirement to digital growth, and how without it there is no way to identify and engage customers in a meaningful way.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Managing SSL certificates with ease
The lack of operational efficiencies and compliance pitfalls associated with poor SSL certificate management, and how the right SSL certificate management tool can help.