Feeds

3Com faces insider trading lawsuit

Bosses talked up share price for personal gain, claims suit

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

3Com has been hit by a class action which alleges the company and unnamed "officers and directors" violated the US Securities Exchanges Act of 1934 by using company money to buy shares in order to boost the stock's value and thus allow the same "insiders" to sell their own shares for an even greater return. The suit, filed in the US District Court for Northern California, claims $130.4 million was spend buying back 4.3 million 3Com shares during the company's first and second quarters of the 1999 financial year. It also claims that 3Com staff made false and misleading claims about the company's performance in order to talk up the share price. And indeed between 1 September 1998 and 32 December 1998, 3Com's share price more than doubled, rising from $23 1/8 to $51 1/8. From November 1998, says the suit, 3Com insiders began selling 4.2 million of their own shares at prices as high as $48.69 per share to net, according to the complaint, $189 million. During February 1999, 3Com's stock fell back to $30 9/16 when it emerged Intel was trimming 3Com's share of the network card market. The suit claims 3Com executives said the company's business plan was intact causing its share price to rally slightly. Unfortunately, at the end of Q2 99, 3Com admitted its sales of modems and network cards were well down and that it was unlikely to match previous forecasts by some margin. By 3 March, the company's share price hit a low of $22 3/4. The action was filed by Atlanta-based law firm Chitwood & Harley, which is now asking 3Com common-stock holders who purchased stock between 22 September 1998 and 2 March 1999 to support the suit. 3Com had yet to respond to the suit at the time of posting. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Big Content outs piracy hotbeds: São Paulo, Beijing ... TORONTO?
MPAA calls Canadians a bunch of bootlegging movie thieves
Google Glassholes are UNDATEABLE – HP exec
You need an emotional connection, says touchy-feely MD... We can do that
YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
Spaffing copyrighted stuff over the web? No search ranking for you
Just don't blame Bono! Apple iTunes music sales PLUMMET
Cupertino revenue hit by cheapo downloads, says report
Hungary's internet tax cannot be allowed to set a precedent, says EC
More protests planned against giga-tariff for Tuesday evening
US court SHUTS DOWN 'scammers posing as Microsoft, Facebook support staff'
Netizens allegedly duped into paying for bogus tech advice
Verizon bankrolls tech news site, bans tech's biggest stories
No agenda here. Just don't ever mention Net neutrality or spying, ok?
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
New hybrid storage solutions
Tackling data challenges through emerging hybrid storage solutions that enable optimum database performance whilst managing costs and increasingly large data stores.
Website security in corporate America
Find out how you rank among other IT managers testing your website's vulnerabilities.