Feeds

IBM witness – MS probes for conflict within IBM

Ah, the 'witness is a rogue cannon' gambit...

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

The essential guide to IT transformation

MS on Trial Microsoft counsel Richard Pepperman, during the deposition of Garry Norris of IBM, revealed a document from Brian Conners, VP of IBM's consumer division, that said: "I would like to feature IE only and remove Netscape. This is contingent upon Microsoft supporting IGN [IBM Global Network] as an ISP. Also with IE 4.0 we will have a channel (1 or 2 of 10) to personalise." Norris said he did not previously know of this. Microsoft is clearly seeking to show that there was some dissent within IBM, and that the browser market was competitive (except that Microsoft does not like to recognise the existence of a browser market, of course). The purpose of Pepperman revealing these details appeared to be so that Microsoft could be seen to be a fair player in the negotiations, and to detract from the absolute power that Microsoft had over OEMs. It became clearer as questioning proceeded that Pepperman wanted to establish that Microsoft was essential to IBM and that it accommodated at least some of IBM's particular contractual needs, even though IBM was Microsoft's most vigorous competitor at the time. Pepperman was interested in having on record an extract from an internal IBM memorandum (about a request for bonuses) that said: "During these negotiations, Microsoft provided IBM with concessions such as selective recovery, recovery CD distribution, open bay, EIAA, and the team negotiated more agreeable terms over onerous terms such as new OPK implementation and GUI restrictions." Occasionally Norris showed some spark. When asked: "It was IBM's first priority, though, wasn't it, to sell and promote IBM solutions on IBM platforms?" he replied: "That's what companies normally do that make products for a profit, yes." Microsoft's greatest fear must be in Norris' direct examination, and the documents that are produced at the time. It begins to look as though IBM is gaining confidence about its contractual relationship with Microsoft. Perhaps revenge will also be sweet, at least for those with a long-enough memory about the OS/2 saga. ® Complete Register trial coverage

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Barnes & Noble: Swallow a Samsung Nook tablet, please ... pretty please
Novelslab finally on sale with ($199 - $20) price tag
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws
Yep, that one place you'd hoped you wouldn't find 'em
Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
Yanked footage featured British-accented attacker and US journo James Foley
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
Netflix swallows yet another bitter pill, inks peering deal with TWC
Net neutrality crusader once again pays up for priority access
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.