Feeds

Mosel Vitelic announces PC-133 support

We learn all about Rambus "cache trashing" and low clock speeds

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Computex Taiwanese memory company Mosel Vitelic announced today that it would provide support for the PC-133 standard with 64Mbit and 128Mbit synchronous DRAMs. And the company furnished facts and figures about PC-133 vs Direct Rambus market share which appear to conclusively show that it will be the dominant technology. According to Mohammad Iqbal, director of worldwide strategic marketing of memories, in 1999 Rambus is likely to have 1.6 per cent market share, with PC-133 scoring 7.7 per cent. That situation will shift dramatically in the year 2000, with PC-133 lording it with 22.1 per cent of the market, Rambus nine per cent, and DDR only three per cent. However, Iqbal said that Mosel Vitelic would support Direct Rambus if it became successful. The problems militating against the techology are threefold, Iqbal said. The first problem was the pricing structure, the second was technical and the third was that Direct Rambus was a new technology and therefore had no evolutionary history. One of the technical problems was something called "cache trashing", said Iqbal. Because clock speeds on Direct Rambus are so high, that meant that application data swamped cache. As a result, PC companies including HP, had asked Rambus to look at its technology again. Because of this problem, the first RIMMs to ship will run at 356MHz rather than the 800MHz that was promised. Iqbal said that PC customers, overwhelmingly, had voted with their feet and wanted to adopt the PC-133 standard. He was not willing to comment on Intel's position on PC-133. But, by now, you'd have thought Intel would have wanted to comment on its own position, particularly so if its customers, the PC companies, feel the way Iqbal described. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.