Intel made big, big mistake
Sueing ViA was not a bright idea
Posted in Business, 21st May 1999 08:08 GMT
Tune into our application security webcast, click here
Our scoop about Intel sueing our friends at ViA has been enhanced by a report on our favourite US site, Techweb, now owned by UK peer Lord Hollick of Hollick. (Story: Intel sues Via -- by mistake) According to Jack Robertson, a nice hack we met at a Big Blue conference in London a few years back, the lawsuit was not the mistake it seemed. He has seen the papers Intel filed and it looks like the chip giant is gunning for the rather successful Taiwanese chip vendor. Intel wouldn't talk to us about the mistake, but our little friends at ViA tipped us off first that it was "a mistake". Actually, we're a little surprised ViA doesn't sue Intel for the mistake, because it must have caused some fluttering of hearts out there in chipsetland. But maybe they're generous souls like us. We didn't sue AMD even though we could've have... ® RegisterFact Intel is actually not very good at taking people to court, despite the fact that it has an absolutely enormous legal department. A few years ago, we upset the lumbering dinosaur by publishing Klamath details from a roadmap we'd seen. Intel promised to sue us. But first, it got our fax number wrong and then it got its European lawyer on the case. The EuroLawyer had no chance against the British lawyer defending us. She rang rings round him. Intel also failed to sue Cyrix over patents. In fact, it only ever seems to have been successful against its little brother, AMD. ®
See what The Register's experts have to say on application security


The future of SaaS and IT infrastructure management
Solving on-premise email challenges with on-demand services
The business case for application security
Reducing messaging and web security costs with managed services

Win a Samsung C6625!
Is your cameraphone an oxymoron?
Reg Mobile and Wireless newsletter is go! go! go!
Sign up, sign up for The Register IT security newsletter