Feeds

Intel close to completing overclocking plans

But can it be done?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

Updated Plans by Intel to prevent overclocking of its processors are nearly complete, according to sources close to the company. At the end of last year, we reported that Intel would introduce locks on microprocessor speeds which would prevent end users from increasing the clock rate on chips. But now, its manufacturing methods mean that Intel chips cannot be overclocked, the source said. "The general rule is if the thing is marked 'Intel confidential' it's an early sample and may not have multiplier locking enabled. If so, there is a utility for Intel mobos that blows a new clock speed into the flash,overrriding the chip's setting. If the chip isn't marked confidential, you're scuppered," the source said. Intel introduced the overclocking lock ostensibly to prevent re-marking of Intel processors, the company said at the time. However,a reader has said that whatever Intel attempts, it may be doomed to failure. He said: "Unless the chip itself has an absolute timer built in it must get its basic time codes from some place on the motherboard. If someone took that spot, identified it and then made a fake time code generator to insert a differnt time code the board would then run at a new high speed. "For example, if the chip has a counter built in and it counts clock pulses for 1 microsecond and has a limit of 500 MHz it will shut down it it gets more than 500 pulses in one microsecond, the 500 MHz rate. "It can be any fixed clock that the CPU can access and use to count pulses to a maximum limit. If you find that clock it uses and reduce the width of that pulse to 1/2 microsecond at 500 MHZ it would then count only 250 and you could then run the board at 1000 mHZ before that counter went over 500 counts. "What is needed is some detailed exploration of the board to figure out what it uses for the time base so that time base can be cracked. I am not a designer, however i feel my concept is valid, unless they have actually built a time base and counter right on the chip to forestall such cracks." Meanwhile, the Microprocessor Report is claiming that Intel has now backtracked on its clock stopping proposal. ® See also Intel says days of overclocking gone Tick, tock, it's overclock time again Intel warns against overclocking new Celerons Intel a white sepulchre on overclocking

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
I'll be back (and forward): Hollywood's time travel tribulations
Quick, call the Time Cops to sort out this paradox!
Musicians sue UK.gov over 'zero pay' copyright fix
Everyone else in Europe compensates us - why can't you?
Megaupload overlord Kim Dotcom: The US HAS RADICALISED ME!
Now my lawyers have bailed 'cos I'm 'OFFICIALLY' BROKE
MI6 oversight report on Lee Rigby murder: US web giants offer 'safe haven for TERRORISM'
PM urged to 'prioritise issue' after Facebook hindsight find
BT said to have pulled patent-infringing boxes from DSL network
Take your license demand and stick it in your ASSIA
Right to be forgotten should apply to Google.com too: EU
And hey - no need to tell the website you've de-listed. That'll make it easier ...
prev story

Whitepapers

Driving business with continuous operational intelligence
Introducing an innovative approach offered by ExtraHop for producing continuous operational intelligence.
Why CIOs should rethink endpoint data protection in the age of mobility
Assessing trends in data protection, specifically with respect to mobile devices, BYOD, and remote employees.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Protecting against web application threats using SSL
SSL encryption can protect server‐to‐server communications, client devices, cloud resources, and other endpoints in order to help prevent the risk of data loss and losing customer trust.