Feeds

Official: Win98 new version to ship in Q3

And is this a browser we see disintegrating itself slowly at version 5.0?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

Microsoft has now officially conceded that there will be another version of Windows 98, and says that what is likely to be called Windows 98 Second Edition will ship in late summer or autumn of this year. The company still hasn't admitted that its plans for a convergence of code on the NT/Win2k kernel are therefore toast, but what were you expecting? Confirmation that Windows 9x lives comes from IE marketing chief Yusuf Mehdi, who says that the new software will include Internet Explorer 5.0 (which is released today) and various other technologies, including Internet Connection Sharing, which will allow multiple computers to access the Internet over a single line. This is clearly intended to take xDSL deployment a stage further via a form of home networking. Microsoft's hit rate when it comes to accurate prediction of how fast consumer broadband is going to take off has so far been absolutely diabolical, but maybe this time it will be different. Win98 #2 does however look very much like the packaging operation we predicted it would be. It will be a service pack on steroids which Microsoft has decided to throw some other bits into, and then call it an OS. Considering the level of technical challenge involved, it shouldn't be too difficult to get it out the door on schedule, but as one of the unfortunate side-effects of the U-turn over convergence is that MS probably doesn't have anything like a full-scale 9x development team in place, traditional slippage is still perfectly possible. That might present a problem, if the ship date slips beyond the end of the trial, and any remedies imposed (assuming Microsoft loses) involve a bit of disintegration. But IE 5.0 shows signs that Microsoft may be preparing for that eventuality. From the user's perspective IE 5.0 appears to be somewhat less closely integrated with the OS than IE 4.0, and although Microsoft is still insisting that the underlying code is tightly integrated, you can see the possibilities here. At the trial Microsoft insisted that there were perfectly valid reasons for code sharing between the shell and the browser, whereas critics suggested that there was more than a little arbitrary gluing together of DLLs to attain this 'integration.' If IE 5.0 looks and feels like shell and browser could be two separate things, then breaking them apart isn't going to cause so many problems with users, and hacking the DLLs apart again can just be done under the covers. So maybe MS is shipping defeatist code. ® Related Stories: Next version of Win98 due in Q2? MS planning Win98 follow-up? MS junks consumer NT plan

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
4chan outraged by Emma Watson nudie photo leak SCAM
In the immortal words of Shaggy, it wasn't me us ... amirite?
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.