Feeds

Chase: AOL ships IE so it can hurt MS case

It helps MS' browser share to hurt Microsoft. Redmond's a psychological snake-pit...

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

MS on Trial Despite its takeover of Netscape, AOL decided to continue its deal with Microsoft over Internet Explorer until 2001. But it only did this in order to help the Department of Justice win its antitrust case against Microsoft, says MS VP Brad Chase. Chase's paranoid reasoning is all too characteristic of senior Microsoft execs. As part of its deal with Netscape AOL has a commitment to develop a new generation of browser technology. AOL is the biggest ISP in the world by a long chalk, and so obviously is going to switch to Netscape-based technology, and away from Microsoft IE, in the long run. Up to this point, we're probably all with Chase's logic. But then he goes running off in a different direction. Normal people might reckon that postponing a switch from IE to Navigator makes sense for AOL because it needs to plan the move, and needs to avoid unnecessary disruption for users. A year would seem to make sense as a minimum period for delay, given that AOL also has to be careful in how it digests Netscape. Chase however may be too familiar with Microsoft's use of the Big Red Switch approach to software upgrades and migrations. He figures AOL could boost Netscape's share instantly if it wanted to, and if it doesn't want to, then it must have a more nefarious reason than mere customer care. If it switched to Navigator he figures its 15 million users would take Netscape's market share, which he puts as neck-and-neck with IE at 50 per cent, up to 70 per cent. Microsoft's would go down to 30 per cent, and that would severely hole the DoJ's case. Bizarre? Possibly. And note also how his claim boosts the importance of AOL, and maybe undermines efforts by MS to downplay the significance of its dealings with the company. His numbers are pretty well correct, as AOL does add something in the region of 20 per cent to IE's total market share, but that means that Microsoft's distribution deals must have been rather more important, and browser quality, less so, than Microsoft has been claiming. ® Complete Register trial coverage

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
Spaffing copyrighted stuff over the web? No search ranking for you
In the next four weeks, 100 people will decide the future of the web
While America tucks into Thanksgiving turkey, the world will be taking over the net
Microsoft EU warns: If you have ties to the US, Feds can get your data
European corps can't afford to get complacent while American Big Biz battles Uncle Sam
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
prev story

Whitepapers

Choosing cloud Backup services
Demystify how you can address your data protection needs in your small- to medium-sized business and select the best online backup service to meet your needs.
Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.