Feeds

MS had plans of its own for an IE uninstaller for Win98

Or so it would appear, from some of the trial exhibits

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Could Microsoft have been considering an uninstall procedure for IE4 in Windows 98? Some evidence suggesting this appears to have been missed by the DoJ, the Princeton puppies (Felten & Co), and the media generally. Remember, you first saw it in The Register first. There is a very interesting clue in an exhibit consisting of slides of a project revue meeting for Windows 98, held on 21 August 1997, and attended by Jim Allchin. An unknown hand (not Allchin's) had written "Uninstall", and from it came two arrows, one with a stressed arrow leading to a box that says "Tune-Up", and the other with an unstressed arrow pointing to the word "Instructions". The most likely explanation would appear to be that at some point in August 1997, the possibility of being able to uninstall IE was being considered, but that it was thought too late to include it directly in the first release of Windows 98. Consequently one possibility was to include the standard uninstall procedure for IE in a subsequently released "Tune-Up" pack (and bug fix). The annotation "instructions" could indicate that written instructions could be included (such as a list of IE files that could be removed) in some documentation. Another annotation said "few corps, lots users", suggesting that Microsoft did not expect much corporate take-up. The exhibit also contains the evidence that Microsoft had tested both Windows 95 and Windows 98 without IE -- something that Jim Allchin denied. David Boies asked Allchin why there was an uninstall procedure for TCP/IP, dialup networking, Netmeeting and Personal Webserver, but not for IE. Evidently, this was a sensitive issue for Allchin, since an email from him to Paul Maritz had suggested: "Move the shell--but not the browser--to the OS team. This was my recommendation before, as you know. It may not be the thing you want to do for other reasons, but it is the right thing to do for the OS (both Memphis and NT). IE 4 would just plug into the environment." ® Complete Register trial coverage

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.