Feeds

UK companies face chaos as phone numbers change

Only four months to go and only one per cent of firms have taken heed

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Half of UK companies are unaware that new telephone numbers and codes are being introduced in less than four months time. Figures obtained by The Register from National Code & Number Change (NCNC), the organisation managing the project, show that only 53 per cent of UK businesses are aware of the sweeping changes due to come into effect on 1 June. The number of firms that have taken any action to prepare for the changeover has remained unchanged at just 10 per cent since November, and the lack of any progress could leave many exposed to problems. An NCNC representative confirmed that only around one per cent of necessary equipment changes had been carried out. He said: "Work on changes to equipment needs to be started soon and it's worrying that more hasn't been done." The changes have been instigated by Oftel to meet the growing demand for telephone numbers in the UK. An Oftel representative expressed little concern over the amount of changeover work still outstanding. "If the research shows that more than half of companies are aware of change, I don't see what else can be done if they chose to ignore it," he said. All businesses in the UK are potentially affected by the new 02 area codes planned for London, Cardiff, Portsmouth, Southampton, Coventry and Northern Ireland. Disruption could occur, if no action is taken, from 1 June 1999, when new codes and numbers will run in parallel with existing codes and numbers. In particular, changes need to be made to telecomms systems which use call barring, call routing and speed dialler services. The recent introduction of the euro and the continuing saga of the millennium bug has forced many companies to ignore the issue altogether while they deal with more pressing matters. But unless companies in the UK implement the changes it could cause widespread disruption and added cost, NCNC has warned. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.