Feeds

Microsoft denies NT failed crypto tests

But some form of compliant module appears to be in the works anyway...

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Microsoft has hotly denied claims that Windows NT 4.0 has failed US government cryptography tests (see earlier story), and has posted a response on the NTbugtraq mailing list. According to Microsoft, the module submitted for evaluation has not yet undergone final testing, and -- QED -- cannot have failed. The Microsoft riposte takes the form of a FAQ produced by Microsoft NT Security product manager Jason Garms. The FAQ denies failure of US government FIPS 140-1 testing, and points out that it is the module Microsoft Enhanced DSS/Diffie-Hellman Cryptographic Provider (CP) which has been submitted for testing, not NT. This is the module which has not undergone final testing. He also points out that the testing lab was not contracted to examine the secuirty of NT 4.0 or the Microsoft CryptoAPI, and says that "while accredited CMVP testing laboratories do make design and implementations back to the vendor to maximise the probability that a cryptomodule will achieve FIPS 140-1 validation, no redesign or change in the Windows NT product was required". But we've not completed testing yet, one might observe. As regards applications, Garms claims that there will be no disruption, the difference being that some apps such as Internet Explorer 4.0 or Outlook 98 won't be able to take advantage of the new cryptomodule’s features, while IE 5.0 will be able to. Finally, he says that the "shipping vehicle" for the new cryptomodule will be determined once it completes evaluation. So, you might wonder, what has this little lot been all about then? On the one hand we've got claims that NT has failed cryptographic tests, and on the other we have absolute denials. It would appear that someone is being less than candid. If we rewind to the original Network World story then we can note that one Patrick Arnold, program manager at Microsoft Federal Systems, is quoted as saying a fix will be offered in Q1, and that "only Internet Explorer 5.0 will know how to work in FIPS mode". So Arnold clearly thinks there's a problem of some sort that warrants a fix. And maybe we can dovetail that neatly into what Garms is talking about -- a FIPS module for NT that is currently undergoing testing, and that will quite possibly ship in this quarter. So maybe Garms FIPS 140-1 cryptomodule is Arnold's fix. We'll leave you to draw your own conclusions about who's being candid here, and about the -- allegedly untested -- CryptoAPIs of NT 4.0. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.