Feeds

Bus wars loom as Intel and PC outfits form rival SIGs

The server big three look tough, but Intel seems to be pulling a flanker on ship dates

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

High performance access to file storage

Bus wars seem certain to break out between two rival camps, Intel-led NGIO and Future I/O, which was announced today (PCI-X gang challenges Intel). The new model has the PCI-X triad, Compaq, IBM and HP, as ring-leaders, but will be locking horns with a heavyweight bunch of rivals, including Dell, Hitachi, NEC, Siemens and Sun. With the announcement of Future I/O it begins to seem that last week’s announcement of an NGIO Forum "to develop and implement a new open I/O architecture for optimising information flow and reliability between mission critical servers2 was a pre-emptive strike. Funnily enough the Future I/O Inititiative "will follow an open industry development and governance model similar to that of the PCI SIG... the governing body responsible for the open development process that has successfully managed the PCI standard over its [apparently shortly to be terminated] lifetime." Quite clearly Compaq, HP and IBM see Future I/O as the successor to PCI, while over in NGIO the idea seems to be more or less the same. "The NGIO Industry Forum, with broad industry participation, will ensure that the architecture is robust, broadly adopted and available for product beginning in 2000. A founding principle of the Forum is that contributions to the core specification should be licensed on a mutual royalty-free basis." But compare and contrast. Future I/O won’t get to product stage until 2002, so Intel’s indulgent support of PCI-X can be seen in that light - carry on lads, while we slide a non-competing future bus standard (PCI-X for the desktop, NGIO for servers and workstations, right) in between it and your next generation. And licensing may be a problem. Rather than being mutually royalty-free, the Future I/O Initiative will recognise "the input from multiple vendors with reasonable and non-discriminatory licensing terms that are very similar to those in many other standards." Sounds pretty shifty, doesn’t it? Round one to the Great Satan of chips. ®

Top three mobile application threats

More from The Register

next story
Dropbox defends fantastically badly timed Condoleezza Rice appointment
'Nothing is going to change with Dr. Rice's appointment,' file sharer promises
Audio fans, prepare yourself for the Second Coming ... of Blu-ray
High Fidelity Pure Audio – is this what your ears have been waiting for?
Record labels sue Pandora over vintage song royalties
Companies want payout on recordings made before 1972
Zucker punched: Google gobbles Facebook-wooed Titan Aerospace
Up, up and away in my beautiful balloon flying broadband-bot
Ex–Apple CEO John Sculley: Ousting Steve Jobs 'was a mistake'
Twenty-nine years later, post-Pepsi exec has flat-forehead moment
Apple DOMINATES the Valley, rakes in more profit than Google, HP, Intel, Cisco COMBINED
Cook & Co. also pay more taxes than those four worthies PLUS eBay and Oracle
Number crunching suggests Yahoo! US is worth less than nothing
China and Japan holdings worth more than entire company
prev story

Whitepapers

SANS - Survey on application security programs
In this whitepaper learn about the state of application security programs and practices of 488 surveyed respondents, and discover how mature and effective these programs are.
Combat fraud and increase customer satisfaction
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Top three mobile application threats
Learn about three of the top mobile application security threats facing businesses today and recommendations on how to mitigate the risk.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.