Feeds

ISP Prodigy wins four-year court battle

Net libel action rests on 50 year-old case law

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Top three mobile application threats

Internet access providers in the US are not legally responsible for defamatory emails or newsgroup postings even though they may have carried them. This ruling in New York State draws a line under a libel suit that has dogged Net access provider Prodigy since 1994 when, according to one judge, some "infantile practical joker" pretending to be 15-year-old boy scout Alex G Lunney, posted a message threatening and defaming a named scout master. Lunney's father, a former prosecutor, filed the suit against Prodigy on his son's behalf, saying that the service provider was liable for the transmission of the scurrilous email. His case rested on the notion that since Prodigy used filtering software, it should have been able to control the content. In 1995, the courts ruled in favour of Lunney saying that online services can be sued for libel if the provider takes steps to control its subscribers' messages. Now that this decision has been overturned -- and openly criticised by the judges who heard the appeal -- it joins a mounting body of evidence supporting the assertion that a service provider is a "passive carrier" (much like phone companies) and therefore cannot be held responsible for messages ferried along its service. Ironically, the unanimous decision relied heavily on a case brought before the courts in the 1940s, enabling Prodigy's attorneys to make the analogy that the transmission of email is no different to the transmission of a telephone message, or a telegraph message. Although the ruling has no specific legal relevance for the UK, it has been welcomed by pressure groups in favour of civil liberties and freedom of speech. Had the decision gone the other way, it could have dealt a massive blow to the development of the Internet since service providers would have been made liable for all the messages they carried regardless of whether they knew about them or not. ®

3 Big data security analytics techniques

More from The Register

next story
Dropbox defends fantastically badly timed Condoleezza Rice appointment
'Nothing is going to change with Dr. Rice's appointment,' file sharer promises
Audio fans, prepare yourself for the Second Coming ... of Blu-ray
High Fidelity Pure Audio – is this what your ears have been waiting for?
Did a date calculation bug just cost hard-up Co-op Bank £110m?
And just when Brit banking org needs £400m to stay afloat
Sorry London, Europe's top tech city is Munich
New 'Atlas of ICT Activity' finds innovation isn't happening at Silicon Roundabout
MtGox chief Karpelès refuses to come to US for g-men's grilling
Bitcoin baron says he needs another lawyer for FinCEN chat
Zucker punched: Google gobbles Facebook-wooed Titan Aerospace
Up, up and away in my beautiful balloon flying broadband-bot
Apple DOMINATES the Valley, rakes in more profit than Google, HP, Intel, Cisco COMBINED
Cook & Co. also pay more taxes than those four worthies PLUS eBay and Oracle
prev story

Whitepapers

Designing a defence for mobile apps
In this whitepaper learn the various considerations for defending mobile applications; from the mobile application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies needed to properly assess mobile applications risk.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Securing web applications made simple and scalable
In this whitepaper learn how automated security testing can provide a simple and scalable way to protect your web applications.