Feeds

Netscape planned to sever ties with Mozilla

Or is Mozilla cunningly trying to get its freedom onto the agenda?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Netscape was last month on the verge of cutting all its ties with Mozilla.org, the body charged with overseeing the Open Source development of Communicator 5.0, it has emerged. Netscape apparently became concerned that it was open to legal action if the work on Communicator 5.0 took in patented software -- Netscape would be left to pick up the tab if the owner of that patented code successfully sued Mozilla. The browser Satan's worries emerged earlier this week at a meeting of the San Francisco Bay Area Linux User's Group meeting in which Mozilla operative Jamie Zawinski. One option for Netscape was to spin off Mozilla, said Zawinski. "If someone sues a non-profit Mozilla.org, that's fine because we have no money," he added. Zawinski claimed Netscape's fears had faded somewhat -- the deal with AOL would rather overshadow lesser matters -- he added that they could yet re-emerge and force Netscape to sever its ties with Mozilla. Of course, Mozilla isn't exactly an innocent party here. As Zawinski himself said, Netscape and Mozilla are separate in spirit and have very different agendas -- and that probably goes double for AOL. Mozilla's agenda is to preserve the Open Source (or, rather, Netscape's modified version of it) nature of Communicator. While AOL CEO Steve Case recently said his company would continue to support the Open Communicator 5.0 initiative, he failed to guarantee that would apply to other versions. Spinning off Mozilla would be a good way of both insuring its independence and bringing the organisation even closer to the pure Open Source philosophy. Talking up Netscape's 'accidentally using patented software' fears is a good way of promoting that goal, whether Netscape ever really considered hiving it off or not. Certainly the chances of copyright code sneaking into core software doesn't seem to have overly worried other Open Source leaning companies, such as Sun. ® See also AOL Netscape deal questions Open Source commitment AOL speaks out on Mozilla support

Intelligent flash storage arrays

More from The Register

next story
BIG FAT Lies: Porky Pies about obesity
What really shortens lives? Reading this sort of crap in the papers
Assange™ slumps back on Ecuador's sofa after detention appeal binned
Swedish court rules there's 'great risk' WikiLeaker will dodge prosecution
You think the CLOUD's insecure? It's BETTER than UK.GOV's DATA CENTRES
We don't even know where some of them ARE – Maude
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Getting started with customer-focused identity management
Learn why identity is a fundamental requirement to digital growth, and how without it there is no way to identify and engage customers in a meaningful way.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
The hidden costs of self-signed SSL certificates
Exploring the true TCO for self-signed SSL certificates, including a side-by-side comparison of a self-signed architecture versus working with a third-party SSL vendor.