Feeds

French prepare further France Telecom sell-off

More cash for the deficit, and a few billion for FT too

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

The French government is selling another 13 per cent of France Telecom, bringing its holding down to around 62 per cent. This assumes that the 2 per cent being bought by Deutsche Telekom for 8 billion francs will not be controlled in effect by France Telecom, because - surprise, surprise - FT is buying a share of DT for, you guessed it, 8 billion francs. The shares just offered were for 390 francs, and will yield some 36 billion francs, of which 23 billion will be retained by FT, and the rest go directly to the French government to help it with its deficit. The way in which the French government has bartered its ownership of France Telecom, or more particularly its pension fund, in order to meet the Maastricht criteria for monetary union has already gone down in history as one of the great conjuring tricks of all time, comparable only with Robert Maxwell's creativity in pension fund management. FT says it will be using the cash to fund its international expansion, with a seemingly absurd expectation of getting a third of its income abroad by 2006. Since only 2 per cent came from outside France in 1995, it has some way to go - but those fonctionnaires at FT should be giving some good parties with all that marketing money. Some of this cash may find its way moving towards some Internet-related activity, or even a face-lift for Minitel. It doesn't sound as though much will be done about speeding up data transmission. There is a distinct possibility that if FT cross-subsidises any services in competition with the private sector, it could find itself in Brussels answering some tough questions from DGIV, the European Commission's competition directorate, where the French have little influence at present.

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.