Feeds

AOL, Netscape colluded to beat ‘Beast of Redmond’, claims MS attorney

And who can blame them? replies DoJ

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

Microsoft attorney Mark Murray has taken to doing the courthouse steps speech for the company when it is felt that Microsoft's trial lawyer, John Warden, has failed to make the point well enough in court. Yesterday, Murray's theme was that there was "startling new evidence" that both Netscape and AOL had worked together against Microsoft, and that the draft agreement between them was "far more explicit" than the accusation against Microsoft for a market sharing agreement. David Boies, the DoJ's trial lawyer, said afterwards that he was not surprised that companies tried to cooperate against Microsoft. "Did you disclose [to the DoJ] that you'd made a market division proposal" [to Netscape in meetings to discuss going after] 'The beast from Redmond'?" Warden asked AOL VP David Colburn. "You're wording, not mine," replied Colburn, rather testily, adding that he wouldn't call the agreement "market division". Colburn was equally firm that whether Microsoft's software worked was only the fifth most important factor for AOL, after such considerations as securing parity with MSN, and how much AOL would have to pay. An interesting snippet to emerge in the case was that AOL CEO Steve Case told Bill Gates in January 1996 that he expected to close an agreement with Netscape that month. Gates emailed his executives: "He said he views us technically as behind Netscape but credible enough to do a very good job." He then offered Internet Explorer free to AOL, the email also said. In the face of such evidence -- Gates acknowledging that AOL thought Navigator superior, and the technical capability of IE being only fifth in order of importance to AOL -- Microsoft's claim that it won the contract "on the merits" of IE is an unsustainable position. ® Click for full Register trial coverage Click for more stories Click for story index

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
BBC: We're going to slip CODING into kids' TV
Pureed-carrot-in-ice cream C++ surprise
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
Twitter: La la la, we have not heard of any NUDE JLaw, Upton SELFIES
If there are any on our site it is not our fault as we are not a PUBLISHER
Facebook, Google and Instagram 'worse than drugs' says Miley Cyrus
Italian boffins agree with popette's theory that haters are the real wrecking balls
Sit tight, fanbois. Apple's '$400' wearable release slips into early 2015
Sources: time to put in plenty of clock-watching for' iWatch
Facebook to let stalkers unearth buried posts with mobe search
Prepare to HAUNT your pal's back catalogue
Ex-IBM CEO John Akers dies at 79
An era disrupted by the advent of the PC
prev story

Whitepapers

Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Why cloud backup?
Combining the latest advancements in disk-based backup with secure, integrated, cloud technologies offer organizations fast and assured recovery of their critical enterprise data.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?