Feeds

AOL, Netscape colluded to beat ‘Beast of Redmond’, claims MS attorney

And who can blame them? replies DoJ

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

The essential guide to IT transformation

Microsoft attorney Mark Murray has taken to doing the courthouse steps speech for the company when it is felt that Microsoft's trial lawyer, John Warden, has failed to make the point well enough in court. Yesterday, Murray's theme was that there was "startling new evidence" that both Netscape and AOL had worked together against Microsoft, and that the draft agreement between them was "far more explicit" than the accusation against Microsoft for a market sharing agreement. David Boies, the DoJ's trial lawyer, said afterwards that he was not surprised that companies tried to cooperate against Microsoft. "Did you disclose [to the DoJ] that you'd made a market division proposal" [to Netscape in meetings to discuss going after] 'The beast from Redmond'?" Warden asked AOL VP David Colburn. "You're wording, not mine," replied Colburn, rather testily, adding that he wouldn't call the agreement "market division". Colburn was equally firm that whether Microsoft's software worked was only the fifth most important factor for AOL, after such considerations as securing parity with MSN, and how much AOL would have to pay. An interesting snippet to emerge in the case was that AOL CEO Steve Case told Bill Gates in January 1996 that he expected to close an agreement with Netscape that month. Gates emailed his executives: "He said he views us technically as behind Netscape but credible enough to do a very good job." He then offered Internet Explorer free to AOL, the email also said. In the face of such evidence -- Gates acknowledging that AOL thought Navigator superior, and the technical capability of IE being only fifth in order of importance to AOL -- Microsoft's claim that it won the contract "on the merits" of IE is an unsustainable position. ® Click for full Register trial coverage Click for more stories Click for story index

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Barnes & Noble: Swallow a Samsung Nook tablet, please ... pretty please
Novelslab finally on sale with ($199 - $20) price tag
Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws
Yep, that one place you'd hoped you wouldn't find 'em
TROLL SLAYER Google grabs $1.3 MEEELLION in patent counter-suit
Chocolate Factory hits back at firm for suing customers
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
Netflix swallows yet another bitter pill, inks peering deal with TWC
Net neutrality crusader once again pays up for priority access
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.