Feeds

The Microsoft Trial continues…

Netscape CEO testimony due to be wrapped up today, and Gates' video evidence should be made public

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

High performance access to file storage

Judge Jackson expects John Warden, Microsoft's trial lawyer, to wind up his cross-examination of Barksdale today. Warden had said that he needed until Monday at the earliest to finish this, but Judge Jackson -- deliberately misunderstanding Warden, it seemed -- said he was going to hold Warden to his Monday commitment. When Warden said he didn't think he made a commitment, Jackson replied: "You just did." The programme seems to have changed somewhat, with eight hours from Gates' 20 hours of videotaped deposition now scheduled to be shown to the court, probably starting Tuesday. It is expected that the video will be released to the media afterwards, which while perhaps not in the Clinton-tape league, is likely to appeal to connoisseurs of these things. It has already been demonstrated that Gates' videotaped responses did not agree with documentary evidence. Leaks about the Gates' videotape, especially from Stephen Houck, the lead lawyer for the 20 States that are also taking action against Microsoft, suggest that Gates is evasive, non-responsive and disingenuous, and even appear to indicated that he doesn't know what a browser is -- Microsoft likes to talk about browser technology being incorporated in Windows, but is hard pressed to explain whether the mac and Unix versions of Internet Explorer are browsers. Rick Rule, a lawyer retained by Microsoft, said that although documents produced by David Boies, the counsel for the DoJ, appeared to show that Microsoft wanted to crush Netscape, "that doesn't make an antitrust violation". Rule has also apparently mischaracterised Barksdale's evidence by claiming that during his cross-examination, the Netscape CEO had never expected Netscape would generate revenue from the browser market and had instead turned to other areas. Even a superficial reading of Barksdale's testimony and cross-examination shows this is absolutely not the case. It would not be the first time that a Microsoft lawyer has made an unwise remark during the defence of Microsoft. Stephen Holley, a partner of Sullivan & Cromwell, Microsoft's principal external lawyers, was caught passing a document "filed under seal" to Linda Himelstein, Business Week's legal editor in September 1995. Although the document concerned another case, it emerged that Holley could be subject to contempt of court proceedings, and that his firm had lax procedures for handling confidential materials. It was revealed by Milo Geyelin in the Wall Street Journal that Holley contradicted testimony from Himelstein, with the result that a Business Week lawyer produced to a court records of some dozen conversations that Holley had had with Himelstein. Thus it came to be known that Holley had criticised an outfit worn by Ann Bingaman [the former head of antitrust at the DoJ]. The notes show Holley "making biting personal snipes about Ms Bingaman and saying that 'everyone on her professional staff thinks she's out of her mind'." To make matters worse, Holley was appointed to the New York City Bar Association's Committee on Professional and Judicial Ethics in 1992. Holley, it seemed, had been a regular deep throat to Business Week during the Microsoft antitrust case. His firm apologised publicly, but the damage was done. ® Click for Register trial coverage Click for more stories

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Dropbox defends fantastically badly timed Condoleezza Rice appointment
'Nothing is going to change with Dr. Rice's appointment,' file sharer promises
Audio fans, prepare yourself for the Second Coming ... of Blu-ray
High Fidelity Pure Audio – is this what your ears have been waiting for?
Did a date calculation bug just cost hard-up Co-op Bank £110m?
And just when Brit banking org needs £400m to stay afloat
MtGox chief Karpelès refuses to come to US for g-men's grilling
Bitcoin baron says he needs another lawyer for FinCEN chat
Zucker punched: Google gobbles Facebook-wooed Titan Aerospace
Up, up and away in my beautiful balloon flying broadband-bot
Apple DOMINATES the Valley, rakes in more profit than Google, HP, Intel, Cisco COMBINED
Cook & Co. also pay more taxes than those four worthies PLUS eBay and Oracle
It may be ILLEGAL to run Heartbleed health checks – IT lawyer
Do the right thing, earn up to 10 years in clink
prev story

Whitepapers

Top three mobile application threats
Learn about three of the top mobile application security threats facing businesses today and recommendations on how to mitigate the risk.
Combat fraud and increase customer satisfaction
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
SANS - Survey on application security programs
In this whitepaper learn about the state of application security programs and practices of 488 surveyed respondents, and discover how mature and effective these programs are.