Feeds

Gagging orders given to plaintiff in Computacenter case

Former technical director gains some respite

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

High performance access to file storage

Gagging orders from giant corporate reseller Computacenter have been passed to a former senior executive who is suing the company for millions of pounds. Dr Mark Sawicki’s case of discrimination was allowed to proceed after a UK Employment Tribunal tossed out Computacenter’s objection that the former engineer had signed a £52,000 deal to keep quiet. Sawicki said today the victory meant other former employees now believed the gagging contracts they have signed were also invalid, and they were supplying them to him to help prove his case. If Sawicki wins his case, he is seeking the 300,000 Computacenter shares he would have had if not asked to leave by company managing director Philip Hulme. He said current value was about £1.3 million but he would seek an equivalent value to the shares at their 12 month peak - currently about £3m. Sawicki is claiming discrimination because he was not able to take the share options with him when he left the company, unlike other executives who have also left. "We were much less believing in ourselves than the judges at the tribunal were. It now takes the case to complex levels because we will have to prove everything is linked," he said. Sawicki said a salesman called him a ‘bloody Pole’ in 1991 without fear of reprimand because of a high sales record as an example of racism going unchecked. He said he needed to link these with his sacking in 1995. Company secretary Alan Pottinger said last week that the contracts, called Compromise Agreements, were used in cases where it makes it easier for staff to leave the company. The number signed was in double figures. Two recent contracts signed were with former maintenance staff, whose complaints in 1994 sparked a four year investigation by the Commission for Racial Equality which is due to finish in November. The Employment Tribunal is also due to decide the sexual discrimination case of Caroline Olds, found to have been unfairly dismissed by Computacenter two years ago. ®

Top three mobile application threats

More from The Register

next story
Dropbox defends fantastically badly timed Condoleezza Rice appointment
'Nothing is going to change with Dr. Rice's appointment,' file sharer promises
Audio fans, prepare yourself for the Second Coming ... of Blu-ray
High Fidelity Pure Audio – is this what your ears have been waiting for?
MtGox chief Karpelès refuses to come to US for g-men's grilling
Bitcoin baron says he needs another lawyer for FinCEN chat
Record labels sue Pandora over vintage song royalties
Companies want payout on recordings made before 1972
Zucker punched: Google gobbles Facebook-wooed Titan Aerospace
Up, up and away in my beautiful balloon flying broadband-bot
Apple DOMINATES the Valley, rakes in more profit than Google, HP, Intel, Cisco COMBINED
Cook & Co. also pay more taxes than those four worthies PLUS eBay and Oracle
Number crunching suggests Yahoo! US is worth less than nothing
China and Japan holdings worth more than entire company
prev story

Whitepapers

SANS - Survey on application security programs
In this whitepaper learn about the state of application security programs and practices of 488 surveyed respondents, and discover how mature and effective these programs are.
Combat fraud and increase customer satisfaction
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Top three mobile application threats
Learn about three of the top mobile application security threats facing businesses today and recommendations on how to mitigate the risk.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.