Feeds

Gagging orders given to plaintiff in Computacenter case

Former technical director gains some respite

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Gagging orders from giant corporate reseller Computacenter have been passed to a former senior executive who is suing the company for millions of pounds. Dr Mark Sawicki’s case of discrimination was allowed to proceed after a UK Employment Tribunal tossed out Computacenter’s objection that the former engineer had signed a £52,000 deal to keep quiet. Sawicki said today the victory meant other former employees now believed the gagging contracts they have signed were also invalid, and they were supplying them to him to help prove his case. If Sawicki wins his case, he is seeking the 300,000 Computacenter shares he would have had if not asked to leave by company managing director Philip Hulme. He said current value was about £1.3 million but he would seek an equivalent value to the shares at their 12 month peak - currently about £3m. Sawicki is claiming discrimination because he was not able to take the share options with him when he left the company, unlike other executives who have also left. "We were much less believing in ourselves than the judges at the tribunal were. It now takes the case to complex levels because we will have to prove everything is linked," he said. Sawicki said a salesman called him a ‘bloody Pole’ in 1991 without fear of reprimand because of a high sales record as an example of racism going unchecked. He said he needed to link these with his sacking in 1995. Company secretary Alan Pottinger said last week that the contracts, called Compromise Agreements, were used in cases where it makes it easier for staff to leave the company. The number signed was in double figures. Two recent contracts signed were with former maintenance staff, whose complaints in 1994 sparked a four year investigation by the Commission for Racial Equality which is due to finish in November. The Employment Tribunal is also due to decide the sexual discrimination case of Caroline Olds, found to have been unfairly dismissed by Computacenter two years ago. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.