Feeds

Madison and Deerfield to split Intel IA-64 architecture

The Intel roadmap is fleshing out towards 2003, when 64-bit will be where it's at

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL

Further details leaking out about the Intel IA-64 roadmap flesh the company's plans out until around 2003, and introduce two more codenames, Madison and Deerfield. According to Gordon Graylish, Intel marketing director EMEA, after McKinley's introduction in 2001, the IA-64 architecture will bifurcate into high-end and low-end versions. These are Madison (high end) and Deerfield (low end), and will be 0.13 micron. Ultimately Deerfield will be a sort of IA-64 Celeron implementation (although unless Celeron's reputation starts improving, Intel might not fancy saying this in 2003), and will at some point supplant the IA-32 line of CPUs which is currently roadmapped at Tanner, Cascades, Foster and then at least one other. The roadmap Intel set out a few weeks ago (see earlier story) covered Madison and McKinley, but didn't name them. It also appears to have been slightly misleading, because although the charts imply that Merced will be supplanted by its McKinley successor, Merced is actually intended to continue in parallel with McKinley, and to evolve into Deerfield. Graylish meanwhile confirms that Intel doesn't want people to get too excited about IA-64 too soon. As reported here earlier, Intel's plans for the continuation of IA-32 make it clear that it anticipates this being the volume platform for some time -- Foster, for example, which will be a contemporary of Merced, will offer "outstanding performance for 32-bit volume apps". Says Graylish: "We think we've got the timeline about right. There's not much requirement for 64-bit today, but in five years' time [ie. 2003] there will be." Asked why in that case people should even bother about 64-bit before McKinley, Graylish pointed out that the lead times in server and application deployment meant it was important for corporations to go with Merced initially. A 12-18 month enterprise deployment cycle would then have them poised for the arrival of McKinley. ® Microprocessor Forum Coverage Click for more stories

Website security in corporate America

More from The Register

next story
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
Israeli spies rebel over mass-snooping on innocent Palestinians
'Disciplinary treatment will be sharp and clear' vow spy-chiefs
Apple CEO Tim Cook: TV is TERRIBLE and stuck in the 1970s
The iKing thinks telly is far too fiddly and ugly – basically, iTunes
Huawei ditches new Windows Phone mobe plans, blames poor sales
Giganto mobe firm slams door shut on Microsoft. OH DEAR
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Found inside ISIS terror chap's laptop: CELINE DION tunes
REPORT: Stash of terrorist material found in Syria Dell box
Show us your Five-Eyes SECRETS says Privacy International
Refusal to disclose GCHQ canteen menus and prices triggers Euro Human Rights Court action
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Security and trust: The backbone of doing business over the internet
Explores the current state of website security and the contributions Symantec is making to help organizations protect critical data and build trust with customers.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.