Feeds

Microsoft killed the PowerPC 615

IBM engineer offers up 615 information

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes

An insider at IBM has responded to the PowerPC 615 story we wrote yesterday with some hard facts -- and corrections --that cannot be ignored. The insider said that Motorola, although it knew of the programme, was never involved and Somerset and IBM Austin were not in the picture too. The IBM Micro team at Burlington performed the 615 miracle, with 250 engineers involved. Even after the programme finished, he said, 40 or so remained at that site. Some went to work on the ASIC ARM and TI DSP cores, while others went to Centaur and the Great Stan of Taperecorders (AMD). While the first pass of hardware performed reasonably, the engineer said that pass two was killed and that level of silicon was never tested. Many of the 250 kept the pass one chips as mementoes. A version of Minix was written to run in PowerPC mode and launch x.86 and PowerPC applications. It proved the concept and a version of OS/2 for the platform also worked. But Microsoft got very cross when it was asked to write a version of Windows to run in the PowerPC mode, it emerged. The chip used .35 micron technology and measured 16.5 by 20 millimeters. According to the source, the VP in charge of the project was sure that the Pentium II would be an IA 64 design and that prompted the die size. If he had not been so sure of that, the die would have been much smaller, the engineer said. The chip, now presumably in keyrings, pendants, earrings and the like, supported x.86 architecture, 32-bit PowerPC architecture and the 64-bit PowerPc architecture. The original PowerPC 64 design was not backwards compatible from an OS point of view. Further, a mode switch from PowerPC to x.86 or vice versa took five CPU clocks. That was the time it took for the pipe to empty one architecture's instructions and fetch the new architecture's instructions. The mode switch, despite press reports, did not take an eternity, but the engineer said the US press did not help... The programme was killed because someone realised it would never make money. That was Microsoft's fault, the engineer added. Microsoft would not give any level of support. ® Click here for more stories

A new approach to endpoint data protection

More from The Register

next story
Amazon says Hachette should lower ebook prices, pay authors more
Oh yeah ... and a 30% cut for Amazon to seal the deal
Philip K Dick 'Nazi alternate reality' story to be made into TV series
Amazon Studios, Ridley Scott firm to produce The Man in the High Castle
Nintend-OH NO! Sorry, Mario – your profits are in another castle
Red-hatted mascot, red-colored logo, red-stained finance books
Sonos AXES support for Apple's iOS4 and 5
Want to use your iThing? You can't - it's too old
Joe Average isn't worth $10 a year to Mark Zuckerberg
The Social Network deflates the PC resurgence with mobile-only usage prediction
Feel free to BONK on the TUBE, says Transport for London
Plus: Almost NOBODY uses pay-by-bonk on buses - Visa
Twitch rich as Google flicks $1bn hitch switch, claims snitch
Gameplay streaming biz and search king refuse to deny fresh gobble rumors
Stick a 4K in them: Super high-res TVs are DONE
4,000 pixels is niche now... Don't say we didn't warn you
prev story

Whitepapers

7 Elements of Radically Simple OS Migration
Avoid the typical headaches of OS migration during your next project by learning about 7 elements of radically simple OS migration.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
Solving today's distributed Big Data backup challenges
Enable IT efficiency and allow a firm to access and reuse corporate information for competitive advantage, ultimately changing business outcomes.
A new approach to endpoint data protection
What is the best way to ensure comprehensive visibility, management, and control of information on both company-owned and employee-owned devices?