Feeds

Northamber pins price erosion on Intel

Turnover is vanity, profit is reality, cash is sanity

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Northamber has placed the blame for market price erosion squarely on Intel’s shoulders. Turning in a good set of annual results, the Chessington-based distributor said “over-frequent announcements of performance upgrades to their Pentium processors... had contributed to purchasing delays and inevitably consumer confusion”. Sales were also adversely affected by the withdrawal by AST from the PC desktop market, the company said. Northamber was at one time Europe’s biggest distributor of AST hardware. Against a background of “the hesitant conditions prevailing in the general marketplace”, Northamber produced sales up 6.8 per cent to £293.46 million for the 12 months to June 30, 1998 (£314 million for the 14 months to June end, 1997). More importantly, the company reported £8.81 million PBT for the year to June 30,1998, against £7.92 million for the 14 months in the previous financial year. Profits were up 30 per cent for the corresponding 12 month period. It ended the year with net cash of £1.7 million, against borrowings of £1.7 million last time. Pre-tax margin increased to 3.0 per cent up from 2.5 per cent last time around, helped along by the channel assembly and late configuration, according to chairman David Phillips. He said the company improved profits because it “avoided the vanity of revenue. We will not chase market share for the sake of it, unlike some of our competitors who end up wrapping money around each box they send out”. Margin retention would remain the key focus of the board, he said. Northamber, linked with bid speculation since last November (when it was first linked with CHS Electronics, the acquisitive US-owned distributor), could be interested in making an acquisition, he said, while noting the scarcity of targets. “If a distributor has a clean balance sheet and a clean business, we could be interested, but there is very little about,” he said. “There are a few big companies, many small companies and nothing left in the middle.”. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.