Feeds

Microsoft ambushed by DOJ

Hits the panic button

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Remote control for virtualized desktops

Microsoft says that the Department of Justice's efforts threaten to convert the case into a "trial by ambush". The allegation was in the latest motion to be filed late yesterday by Microsoft in the Washington DC federal court. The DoJ's response filed on Monday was careful not to set out in detail the additional issues that have been found during the discovery process. Recognising that it may not prevail in its motion to have the case dismissed, for which there is an oral hearing on 11 September, Microsoft has hit the panic button as it increasingly became aware that it faced a subtle broadening of the case. Microsoft says that it should only have to answer the original charges made in May -- the tying of IE and Windows 98; the provisions in Microsoft contracts concerning the promotion and distribution of IE; and Microsoft's illegal contract provisions that prevent PC manufacturers from removing features or functionality from Windows 98. Microsoft says that the schedule for the trial was set on the basis of these being the charges. Microsoft list six new matters that it says have arisen: dealings with Apple concerning streaming audio and video; dealings with Intel concerning Intel's native signal processing, and Intel's development of applications written in Java; dealings with RealNetworks concerning streaming audio and video; allegations by Sun over pure Java; allegations by Caldera concerning DR-DOS; and anticipated allegations concerning Bristol Technologies claim for access to NT code. Although these additional matters have arisen during the process of discovery, and are legitimate issue to be brought up at the trial on 23 September, Microsoft claims that each matter requires detailed preparation, and that this would take another six months. It seems clear that Microsoft wishes to delay the start and escalate the complexity of the case. It is unlikely that Judge Jackson will agree to an extended period of preparation, having had to change the date one already. Informed observers forecast that Microsoft will win a delay in the court of appeals. It is known that the judges there follow the so-called Chicago school opposed to antitrust and support Microsoft. In the cases so far, they have brushed aside Congress-enacted law -- the Tunney Act, the Publicity in Taking Evidence Act, and the Sherman Antitrust Act - in favour of judge-made law.®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
MI6 oversight report on Lee Rigby murder: US web giants offer 'safe haven for TERRORISM'
PM urged to 'prioritise issue' after Facebook hindsight find
BIG FAT Lies: Porky Pies about obesity
What really shortens lives? Reading this sort of crap in the papers
Assange™ slumps back on Ecuador's sofa after detention appeal binned
Swedish court rules there's 'great risk' WikiLeaker will dodge prosecution
You think the CLOUD's insecure? It's BETTER than UK.GOV's DATA CENTRES
We don't even know where some of them ARE – Maude
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
10 ways wire data helps conquer IT complexity
IT teams can automatically detect problems across the IT environment, spot data theft, select unique pieces of transaction payloads to send to a data source, and more.
5 critical considerations for enterprise cloud backup
Key considerations when evaluating cloud backup solutions to ensure adequate protection security and availability of enterprise data.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?